As Femi Gbajabiamila keeps on sinking to more profound in the outrage of the extortion case that happened in the United States of America over 10 years back, for which he was discovered blameworthy by the Supreme Court of Georgia, US, his greatest partner, President Muhammadu Buhari and his gathering, the All Progressives Congress (APC) have kept quiet.
It isn't evident whether Buhari will require a test into the dinghy past of the official, whom the Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, freely guaranteed is Buhari's blessed contender for the House of Representatives' speakership.
Be that as it may, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) said it doesn't have the established capacity to research the charges of extortion and conviction against Femi Gbajabiamila by a US court.
The National Commissioner and Chairman, Voter Education and Information, Festus Okoye unveiled this when SaharaReporters asked if the commission will pull back the endorsement of return of the administrator and indict him for lying on vow. See Also
Selective: Gbajabiamila Was Found Guilty By Supreme Court Of Georgia In US
181 Comments 20 Hours Ago
Okoye said that the commission did not have capacity to capture or research the claims leveled against the administrator.
In spite of the fact that he conceded that the commission is enabled to arraign any appointive guilty parties if the commission get a report with that impact from the fitting specialist.
He noticed that it is a pre-decision matter, including that anyone or gathering who is wronged should make a formal objection to the fitting specialist accused of the obligation to make capture and examine.
Okoye expressed that INEC has not gotten any formal report from any expert with respect to the issue.
He called attention to that the commission had led decisions and distributed the names of the victors and on the off chance that there is a proof that someone isn't qualified, at that point the individual should channel his grumbling to the specialist that is accused of that duty.
He focused on that the issue presently is for the proper offices to examine the claim before the commission can indict.
An open undertakings examiner, Mr. Jide Ojo, expressed that the issue of US conviction has turned into a common decimal, including that it's anything but an issue that worries INEC. He clarified that it is just the court of able purview that can make a weighty request on the issue.
Ojo noticed that the Coalition of United Political Parties (CUPP) ought to enable the court to choose the case on its legitimacy. He kept up that it is just the court that can arrange the withdrawal of Gbajabiamila's declaration of return.
He contended that the appointive umpire can't found any examination on the issue focusing on that the Electoral Act just give the prosecutorial capacity to the constituent body.
The examiner considered how the court can choose the case in front of the initiation of the ninth national gathering which has been slated for June 11, 2019.
Endeavors to get the response of Mr. Keen Olanrewaju, Media Assistant to the Femi Gbajabiamila was fruitless as his cell phone was turned off.
President Muhammadu Buhari and the All Progressives Congress (APC ) have not owned any official remark or expression in regards to the issue.
Prior on Wednesday the Femi/Wase Campaign Group at a question and answer session prevented the charges from claiming Gbajabiamila's conviction and took steps to make a legitimate move against CUPP.